Saturday, January 24, 2015
Monday, December 22, 2014
By definition silviculture is CONTROL. Stakeholder control of forest for resources. In the process the natural forests are destroyed.
All silviculture is bad. Silviculture is agriculture for the forest. A silvicultured forest is the opposite of a species' forest. All logging/silviculture on government controlled federal and state must end. Ending logging is a known proven "technology." No research or ecological studies need be done. There is no learning curve for ending logging. There is no gap in our technology. No scientists need be consulted. We only need the political will to return the forests. Like ending slavery in the US, a mere stoke of the pen will do the trick. A stakeholder is a person who has a money or property interest in some action. Forests do not belong to stakeholders. Forest are important for the Species' Planet and the world climate.
|See what silviculture schooling has done to the US western national forests.|
Silviculture has caused great harm to US forest. It encourages invasive species which have become a very serious problem. It changes the local climate and water conditions. It artificially alters the native species populations so that a dynamic equilibrium cannot be achieved. In the Eastern US state forestry has been duped into converting community forests into fake "natural" forests by using disingenuous terminology such as "best practices" an "healthy" forests.
Friday, November 07, 2014
The return of the native AMERICAN CHESTNUT tree
About two centuries ago the site of the Species List Forest, Conway, MA (US) had all the giant trees native to the completely forested broadleaf canopy of, what is now, the northeastern US. It also contained native mega-fauna and a more diverse native fungi and native soil bacteria. The complete return of this species' forest will take centuries, but that will not discourage us from planning its return.
The complete return requires several things to happen at the same time. Most importantly, the forest must be neglected by resource management which would preclude all recreational use other than walking. Second, invasive species (animals, plant, fungi and microbes) must be eliminated. Third, native species must be brought back to thrive.
A transgenic resistant native plant is good. We brought the tree killing fungus to North America and this is a way to save the chestnut tree from that fungus.
"Continuing research by ESF and collaborators from other institutions indicates that the transgenic trees do not affect the composition of leaf litter, the feeding habits of insects or the growth of ecologically important fungi."
Tuesday, June 10, 2014
|100+ year old barbed wire on top of forested hill in Massachusetts (US).|
|Common black bear poop, Massachusetts (US).|
Monday, May 19, 2014
Money vs the Rights of Nature
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts (US)
The state of Massachusetts now has two constitutional amendments/laws/judgements which remove money as an issue for the return of the natural landscape.
1. The high court of Massachusetts has now said that land set aside for public conservation benefit cannot be taxed by the towns. Again, this advances the Rights of Nature by making it easier for conservation groups to own conservation land and not be burdened by costs.
2. Several decades ago Massachusetts removed all individual liability from the owners of land open to the public. That allowed conservationists to set aside land without the burden of liability insurance. Although intended to serve community interests this amendment to the MA constitution actually advanced the Rights of Nature.
This (1) relief of insurance obligation and (2) no tax obligations is a one-two punch for the Rights of Nature.
From the Deep Woods of the Species' Forest
Friday, April 04, 2014
Species' Forest 1, Conway, MA, R. Stafursky, Brattleboro, VT (US)
Monday, March 17, 2014
A SPECIES' FOREST is neither (1) biodiversity nor (2) sustainability. Those are resource words. What? Yes, I can say this because these words (biodiversity and sustainability) have been gladly adopted by resource extraction industries. They are interpretive and that make these words useless.
Biodiversity is not equilibrium. Sustainability is not equilibrium. EQUILIBRIUM and SPECIES' FOREST will never be used by the forest product extraction industry, because these terms are either 100 percent or nothing at all and resource people do not want to defend a forest 100 percent.